@larand Yes, that was an excellent image source, I used it too when I had the Lumia 1020.
// @skematica @indigo @kdfrawg
Just seen an online ad for a 32-inch iMac. So I asked them what size it really is.
@jmreekes And then Tiger came along, the G3 350 MHz was no good, I needed one with Firewire ports, so I traded up to a 600 MHz G3 iMac with a DVD ROM drive.
And then along comes Leopard, minimum requirement being a G4 of at least 867 MHz, I bought a used G4 eMac (1 GHz/1 GB RAM/40 GB HDD) which I still have & occasionally use. I just have to get a fix from that luscious 17-inch flat CRT. A lovely display.
// @kdfrawg @gtwilson
@kdfrawg The first colour Mac I had was my school-teacher sister's no longer needed (they'd gone PC) Performa 5400. That had a variable screen. Depending on how it felt at the time it would be either the expected 15-inch or it would shrink to about 9-inches.
When the display died I got my first G3 iMac.
// @jmreekes @gtwilson
@gtwilson My eyes can only take in so much. I need reading glasses for computer work and anything bigger than 24-inches means I have to move further away from the screen, quite negating the purpose of the thing.
// @jmreekes @kdfrawg
@jmreekes A year ago our Men's Shed group bought a 21.5-inch iMac. As the needs for it are not intensive, a 1 TB HDD & 8 GB of RAM were considered to be plenty. But if I were buying for myself, I'd get a Fusion drive & 16 GB of RAM at a minimum. I find the 27-inch to be too big.
// @gtwilson
@kdfrawg Whereas while I have hundreds of desktop pictures, some I have taken, others are either imported or just plain stolen.
// @skematica
@jmreekes You're correct re the 21.5-inch models, however the new 27-inch iMacs can still be upgraded by the user. They'll take up to 32 GB in four slots.
// @gtwilson
@kdfrawg Not possible to hold the under-seat switch down or temporarily bypass it?