A Lovely 10C Site!

@kdfrawg Earlier in Cappuccino's development, it behaved differently on the iPhone when saved to the desktop vs opened from a bookmark. The difference was when opened from a bookmark in a browser, tapping a photo opened it in a new window. Tapping a photo when opened from the desktop had the photo taking over the session. You had to quit the desktop app & reopen it to get back in.
But that was then. Now photos don't zoom off to a larger size on an iPhone regardless of whether it's via the desktop or a bookmark.

// @skematica

@skematica Works fine on my SE.

@skematica It was angst-driven. My head hurts from headache & other stuff

Got my grump on real bad today. My knees hurt, I have a headache that responds best to lying down & gastric reflux that responds best to sitting. And I'm colder than the weather conditions indicate I should be.

@skematica Fuck off and die then. In a fire.

Fudge it. Small wonder I'm cold. 3℃ outside. It's 7:15 am. Two hours ago it was 4 ℃ outside.

@skematica Should use, not can use.

@literary Huzzah!

The Mac User group has been looking for an economical replacement for a 2007 XServe (originally donated by Apple in 2009) to run the OpenText FirstClass BBS they use. The latest FC Server software needs better than OS 10.7.5, which is the best that model of XServe can deliver.
Finally the Treasurer decided she & her husband could part with their 2012 Mac Mini for a fair price. This is a 2.3 GHz Core i7 quad-core machine currently with 4 GB of RAM. It'll cost an extra $160 to upgrade the RAM to 16 GB & $600 to the Mac itself, $31 for macOS server & about $150 more for a suitable rackmount.

An Apple reseller quoted $2100 to upgrade a 2014 2.8 GHz Core i5 dual-core Mac Mini to 3.0 GHz Core i7 & 16 GB of RAM. This is without the rackmount.

You'd think the 2.3 GHz i7 wouldn't be as good a processor as the 3.0 GHz i7 but the telling factor is the former is a quad-core vs the current model's dual-core. Under Geekbench testing, the older 2.3 benchmarks at more than 25% faster than the newer one.

So under $1000 vs over $2000, no contest. The older & better machine will be come into service very soon.

Saw one of these in my recent travels.

What were they thinking (if indeed thought was involved, questionable) when they designed the rear of it? Those tail-lights look like they're bleeding.